Sources and historical evidence

Sources are traces to investigate. Ask who created them, why, and what they can actually show before accepting a claim.

Lesson 2 of 33 parts Practice Flashcards

1/3

Primary source and Secondary source

Objective: Explain primary source and secondary source, distinguish their meanings, and apply them to a described case.

Primary source: A primary source originates in the period or activity being studied under the research question. Secondary source: A secondary source interprets evidence about the past. European history uses geographical and temporal categories that changed over time. Sources reflect creators, purposes, and preservation conditions. A historical claim must connect evidence to a defined question rather than treat one account as representative of everyone. Comparison uses shared criteria while preserving differences. Multiple causes and contingency help explain events without assuming that a familiar outcome was inevitable. Application: A contemporary letter supplies evidence about its author's experience. This most directly illustrates primary source. A later historian compares contemporary records. This most directly illustrates secondary source.

Worked examples

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A contemporary letter supplies evidence about its author's experience. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: A contemporary letter supplies evidence about its author's experience. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: A primary source originates in the period or activity being studied under the research question. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of primary source. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A later historian compares contemporary records. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: A later historian compares contemporary records. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: A secondary source interprets evidence about the past. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of secondary source. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

Swipe sideways to move between sections

Primary source and Secondary source

Objective: Explain primary source and secondary source, distinguish their meanings, and apply them to a described case.

Worked examples

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A contemporary letter supplies evidence about its author's experience. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A later historian compares contemporary records. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Provenance and Contextualization

Objective: Explain provenance and contextualization, distinguish their meanings, and apply them to a described case.

Provenance: Provenance identifies a source's origin and relevant history. Contextualization: Contextualization places a source within its historical circumstances. European history uses geographical and temporal categories that changed over time. Sources reflect creators, purposes, and preservation conditions. A historical claim must connect evidence to a defined question rather than treat one account as representative of everyone. Comparison uses shared criteria while preserving differences. Multiple causes and contingency help explain events without assuming that a familiar outcome was inevitable. Application: A reader checks who produced an inscription. This most directly illustrates provenance. A speech is read alongside the conflict surrounding it. This most directly illustrates contextualization.

Worked examples

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A reader checks who produced an inscription. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: A reader checks who produced an inscription. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: Provenance identifies a source's origin and relevant history. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of provenance. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A speech is read alongside the conflict surrounding it. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: A speech is read alongside the conflict surrounding it. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: Contextualization places a source within its historical circumstances. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of contextualization. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

Corroboration and Source limitation

Objective: Explain corroboration and source limitation, distinguish their meanings, and apply them to a described case.

Corroboration: Corroboration compares independent evidence to test claims. Source limitation: A limitation identifies what a source cannot establish alone. European history uses geographical and temporal categories that changed over time. Sources reflect creators, purposes, and preservation conditions. A historical claim must connect evidence to a defined question rather than treat one account as representative of everyone. Comparison uses shared criteria while preserving differences. Multiple causes and contingency help explain events without assuming that a familiar outcome was inevitable. Application: A memoir is compared with records and other accounts. This most directly illustrates corroboration. One person's account is not treated as everyone's experience. This most directly illustrates source limitation.

Worked examples

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: A memoir is compared with records and other accounts. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: A memoir is compared with records and other accounts. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: Corroboration compares independent evidence to test claims. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of corroboration. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

Try itOriginal teaching scenario: One person's account is not treated as everyone's experience. Which idea from this section does it most directly illustrate?Show answer

Step 1 — Read the observation: One person's account is not treated as everyone's experience. Step 2 — Recall the relevant idea: A limitation identifies what a source cannot establish alone. Step 3 — Connect the observation to the idea: The scenario is an illustration of source limitation. Step 4 — Check the limit: This short scenario illustrates the concept; it does not establish every detail or exclude every other influence in a real situation.

You finished the reading!

Lock it in with a few practice questions, then move on to the next lesson.

Practice Next lesson

Previous lessonGeography and chronology Next lessonBuilding historical arguments